Stock Faceoff: General Motors or Toyota?
Recent financial performance suggests that GM is definitely the winner here with a net margin of 3.5%, higher than Toyota's 2.5%. But GM was a much smaller company. In 2010, GM sales totaled $136 billion on $4.7 billion in profit while Toyota's last 12 months' sales were $242 billion on which it earned $6.1 billion in profit.
And GM is poised to retake the top spot in world vehicle market share. According to Bloomberg, GM's Malibu is getting better reviews than the formerly GM-beating Toyota Camry. Moreover, GM is gaining share in China -- expecting to sell five million vehicles there by 2015 -- double its current total. Meanwhile the March 2011 Japan earthquake is cutting Toyota's vehicle production by 500,000.
But both companies have suffered from management problems. As I posted in May 2009, GM failed for five reasons: Bad financial policies, uncompetitive vehicles, ignoring the competition, failure to innovate and managing in the bubble. And after its restructuring and emergence from bankruptcy, it looks like it has changed for the better.
Meanwhile, Toyota lost its way. How so? As I wrote in February 2010, in 2002 Toyota saw GM's weakness as an opportunity to grow much faster to overtake GM. But in focusing on that goal, Toyota uprooted itself from the very strengths that enabled it to beat GM -- specifically, its system of mentoring young engineers that ensured a stream of ever-higher-quality vehicles.
But all this history should not drive your investment decision now. Instead, consider using the Price/Earnings to Growth (PEG) ratio that compares a stock's market valuation to its forecast earnings growth. By that measure, if a stock trades at a PEG of 1.0 or lower, it is reasonably priced. Higher than that, and it looks over-valued.
Here are the results of this analysis for GM and Toyota: